Claude for legal, explained

Anthropic's legal plugins: what they do, how to set them up, and where Claren fits for your team.

ScreenCloudTelecom Infrastructure PartnersKao DataEasyParkdryrobeGeorgia United Credit UnionnLightenMack Real Estate Group

Comparison · Updated 17 October 2026 · By the Claren team

The short answer

  • Claude for Legal is a set of 12 practice-area plugins and 23 connectors on top of Anthropic's general Claude model.
  • It gives one lawyer at a time a drafting and review assistant, inside Claude and in Word.
  • It isn't a legal team: each lawyer sets it up, runs it and checks it, alone.
  • Claren is built as AI employees for in-house teams: they take the request, follow one shared playbook, keep your records and hand back finished work.

What Claude for Legal is

A general model with legal skills added, released in two steps through 2026.

In January 2026 Anthropic added plugins to Cowork, its desktop agent, and published a starter set of eleven. One of them was Legal: review documents, flag risks, track compliance. It was a single plugin for every paid Claude user, offered as a research preview.

In May 2026 Anthropic followed it with Claude for the legal industry: twelve practice-area plugins (commercial, corporate, employment, privacy, product, regulatory, AI governance, IP, litigation, and three for students, clinics and builders) and twenty-three connectors to the systems lawyers already use, from iManage and NetDocuments to Ironclad, Docusign and Thomson Reuters CoCounsel.

Underneath, it is still Claude: a general-purpose model that writes well and reasons carefully, now given legal instructions and a way to reach legal tools. That is the important point for a legal team choosing between it and a platform built for legal work. The plugins change what one person can ask Claude to do. They don't change who does the work.

What's inside

Three pieces, all built around one lawyer working in Claude.

  • Practice-area plugins. Each plugin is a bundle of instructions and named agents for one area of law, such as an NDA triager or a renewal watcher. They are open source, so a team can read and adapt them.
  • Connectors. Twenty-three MCP connectors reach document systems, deal rooms, e-discovery platforms and research services. Many need your own subscription and key for that product: Ironclad, iManage, Everlaw and CoCounsel among them.
  • Places to work. Claude in the browser and desktop app, Cowork for scheduled tasks, and Claude for Microsoft 365, which redlines in Word with tracked changes and compares a contract with a playbook clause by clause.

How to set it up

Each lawyer does this for themselves. Allow an afternoon, plus the connectors.

  1. Get a paid Claude plan. Pro for one person, or Team or Enterprise for a firm or department. On Enterprise, an administrator turns the legal plugins on for the workspace.
  2. Install the plugins. In Cowork, open Customise and browse the plugins, or upload them from Anthropic's GitHub repository. Developers can install them in Claude Code too.
  3. Run the cold-start interview. Each plugin begins with a 10 to 20 minute interview that writes a practice profile: your playbook positions, who to escalate to and your house style.
  4. Connect your systems. Add the connectors you need, with your own credentials for each product. Without a research connector, Claude flags its citations for you to check.
  5. Repeat for every lawyer. Profiles and plugins live with the person who set them up. A team of five does all of this five times, and keeps five profiles in step.

Claude for Legal and Claren, side by side

One is a general model with legal skills added. The other is a legal team that works for you.

ClarenClaude for Legal
Built forIn-house legal teamsEach lawyer, in their own Claude
Takes a request and hands back finished work✓YesDrafts for the lawyer to finish
Runs the team's intake from Slack✓YesChats in Slack, one person at a time
Works on its own, on a schedule or a message✓YesScheduled tasks, per person
One playbook for the whole team✓YesA profile per lawyer
Keeps your contracts and terms in orderDatastores, kept by envoys—No
Builds trackers and apps on your data✓Yes—No
SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001✓Yes✓Yes
Zero data retention in the appEnterpriseAPI only

— Not listed on their own site.

An assistant is not a legal team

Why in-house work outgrows a plugin.

In-house legal work doesn't arrive as a prompt. It arrives as a message from sales about a customer's paper, a renewal nobody flagged, a supplier asking for the DPA back by Friday, and twenty NDAs a week from across the business. It needs picking up, doing, filing and remembering, whether or not a lawyer has a free hour.

Claude for Legal waits for a lawyer to open Claude and ask. What comes back is a draft for that lawyer to check and finish, and whatever it learned stays in that lawyer's profile. The next lawyer starts again.

Claren is built the other way round. Its envoys are AI employees with their own computer and memory. They take requests from the Claren app or straight from Slack, review against the team's single playbook, hand back tracked-change redlines in Word, file every contract and its terms in the team's datastore, and run routines on a schedule, checking renewals each morning or reading every contract that lands in a channel. Before anything leaves the team, they ask.

That is the difference between a better way for one lawyer to work and work taken off the whole team.

What Claude for Legal costs

The plugins come with Claude's plans. The real cost is everything around them.

There is no separate price for the legal plugins. A lawyer needs a paid Claude plan: Pro from $20 a month, Team from $25 per seat a month, or Enterprise, which Anthropic sells with a 20-seat minimum and usage billed on top.

The connectors are where the bill grows. Many reach products you pay for separately, with your own subscription and key: Ironclad, iManage, Everlaw, CoCounsel. A team that wants research it can rely on needs a research connector, and a research licence behind it.

Then there is the time. Every lawyer installs the plugins, runs the interview, connects their systems and keeps their profile current. Nobody owns the team's version, because there isn't one. For a team of five, that is five setups to maintain and five sets of answers to reconcile.

Claren is priced per seat, on the page, with usage included: Pro at $70 and Team at $250 per seat a month, and a free plan for one person. The envoys, the shared playbook, the routines and the team's records come with it.

A week of in-house work, both ways

The same requests, handled by a lawyer with Claude, and by Claren's envoys.

Monday. Sales sends three NDAs and a customer's MSA in Slack. With Claude, a lawyer downloads each one, opens Claude, uploads it, reviews the answer and redlines it in Word. With Claren, the envoy linked to the sales channel picks all four up, reviews them against the team's playbook and posts the tracked-change redlines back in the thread, with a note on anything off-playbook.

Wednesday. A supplier renewal is due in thirty days and nobody has noticed. Claude only knows what it is asked. Claren's renewals routine checked the contract tracker that morning and flagged it, with the notice clause and the date.

Friday. The general counsel wants to know what came in this week and where it stands. With Claude, someone assembles it by hand. With Claren, every request was filed in the team's datastore as it was handled, and the envoy writes the summary.

The model in both cases may be the same. What differs is who does the work.

“Claren’s reliability means we get to the heart of an issue faster, without getting bogged down in manual review.”
Carl DuntonGeneral Counsel, Peak Energy

The verdict, tool by tool

How Claude for Legal compares with Claren for an in-house legal team.

Claude for Legal

A general model with legal plugins added. Turning it into a working legal team is left to you.

Twelve practice-area plugins and twenty-three connectors on Anthropic's Claude. It drafts, reviews against a profile, and redlines in Word for the lawyer using it, with scheduled tasks in Cowork.

Strengths

  • Runs on Anthropic's general-purpose models.
  • A wide range of connectors, if you hold subscriptions to the products behind them.
  • Open-source plugins a technical team can adapt.

Where it falls short

  • Not a legal team out of the box: each lawyer sets it up and works alone, in their own Claude.
  • Not suited to in-house intake: it answers whoever asks it, but it doesn't pick up, route or track the team's requests.
  • Unreliable on authority without a paid research connector: citations come back flagged for checking.
  • Weaker data terms for legal work: Anthropic says its Team and Enterprise apps aren't eligible for zero data retention.
Best for
Lawyers happy to set up and run their own AI, one person at a time.

Claren

The only tool here built as AI employees for in-house legal teams: they take the request, do the work and hand it back finished.

Claren gives a legal team envoys: AI employees, each with its own computer and memory. They take work from the app or from Slack, follow the team's playbook, hand back tracked-change redlines in Word, keep the team's contracts and terms in a datastore, and run routines on a schedule. Envoys can run on Anthropic's models too.

What it does for an in-house team

  • Built for in-house legal teams from the start.
  • AI employees, not a chat box. Envoys take a request, do the work and hand it back finished.
  • Your playbook goes in once, and every envoy follows it on every contract.
  • Work that starts on its own: routines run on a schedule, or when a Slack message lands.
  • The team's own records, built and kept current by envoys, with trackers and apps on top.
  • SOC 2 Type II and ISO/IEC 27001:2022. Data in the US, UK or EU, never used to train models.
Best for
In-house legal teams that want work taken off their plate, not just made faster.

See Claren in action.

Which one should your team use?

Four questions settle it.

  1. Is the work one lawyer's, or the team's? If one lawyer wants a better assistant, Claude for Legal will help them. If the team needs requests picked up and finished, that is what Claren's envoys are for.
  2. Where do requests come from? If they come from the business, in Slack and email, you want something that picks them up, routes them and tracks them there. Claren does; Claude answers whoever asks it.
  3. Do you need one playbook, or one per person? Claude keeps a profile for each lawyer who sets it up. Claren holds one playbook for the team, and every envoy follows it.
  4. Who keeps the records? Claude leaves the filing to you. Claren's envoys file every contract and its terms as they go, and build your trackers on top.

Using both

Plenty of teams keep a general assistant, and give Claren the work.

There's no need to choose a model. Claren's envoys run on models from Anthropic, OpenAI and Google, chosen per envoy, so a team that likes Claude keeps it. What Claren adds is everything around the model that turns it into a working legal function: intake, a shared playbook, routines, records and sign-off.

A common split: lawyers keep Claude for quick questions and personal drafting, and route the work that repeats (NDAs, supplier contracts, renewals, data room reviews) to Claren's envoys, which pick it up from Slack and hand it back done.

More comparisons

Questions

What is Claude for Legal?

Anthropic's legal offering for Claude, launched in May 2026: twelve practice-area plugins and twenty-three connectors that let one lawyer use Claude for drafting, review and research, in Claude and in Word.

How do I install the Claude legal plugin?

On a paid Claude plan, open Cowork, go to Customise and browse the plugins, or upload them from Anthropic's GitHub repository. Each plugin then runs a 10 to 20 minute interview to record your playbook and style. Every lawyer does this for themselves.

How much does Claude for Legal cost?

It comes with Claude's plans: Pro from $20 a month, Team from $25 per seat a month, Enterprise by agreement with a 20-seat minimum. Many connectors need separate subscriptions to the products they reach, such as Ironclad, iManage or CoCounsel.

Is Claude for Legal good for in-house legal teams?

It suits an individual lawyer who wants an assistant. In-house teams need more than that: requests picked up from the business, one playbook for everyone, records kept and work done without a lawyer at the keyboard. That is what Claren is built for.

Can Claude review contracts against our playbook?

Yes, for the lawyer who set up the profile, inside Claude or Word. Claren does it for the whole team: the playbook goes into the envoys' memory once, and every contract that comes in is reviewed against it and returned as a tracked-change redline.

Is Claude for Legal safe for privileged material?

Anthropic recommends commercial terms with a data processing agreement and says its Team and Enterprise apps aren't eligible for zero data retention. Claren holds SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001, keeps each organisation's data apart, keeps an audit trail of every action and never trains models on your data.

Does Claren use Claude?

It can. Claren's envoys run on models from Anthropic, OpenAI and Google, chosen per envoy, through their APIs. Claren is an independent company, not part of Anthropic.

What's the difference between Claude for Legal and Claren?

Claude for Legal makes one lawyer faster. Claren gives the team AI employees that take the work off them: intake from Slack, one shared playbook, routines on a schedule, and every contract filed in the team's records.

See Claren in action.

Claren

Put your first AI employee to work.